Don't ignore reachability of tag objects in fsck

diff --git a/epoch.c b/epoch.c
index fdfaddafbcba305caa0ed092b16c7e960fd45b36..a7e84fc59a0927334747effc8d41138a8569a96d 100644 (file)
--- a/epoch.c
+++ b/epoch.c
@@ -424,18 +424,9 @@ static void mark_ancestors_uninteresting(struct commit *commit)
 static void sort_first_epoch(struct commit *head, struct commit_list **stack)
 {
        struct commit_list *parents;
-       struct commit_list *reversed_parents = NULL;
 
        head->object.flags |= VISITED;
 
-       /*
-        * parse_commit() builds the parent list in reverse order with respect
-        * to the order of the git-commit-tree arguments. So we need to reverse
-        * this list to output the oldest (or most "local") commits last.
-        */
-       for (parents = head->parents; parents; parents = parents->next)
-               commit_list_insert(parents->item, &reversed_parents);
-
        /*
         * TODO: By sorting the parents in a different order, we can alter the
         * merge order to show contemporaneous changes in parallel branches
@@ -445,8 +436,8 @@ static void sort_first_epoch(struct commit *head, struct commit_list **stack)
         * changes.
         */
 
-       while (reversed_parents) {
-               struct commit *parent = pop_commit(&reversed_parents);
+       for (parents = head->parents; parents; parents = parents->next) {
+               struct commit *parent = parents->item;
 
                if (head->object.flags & UNINTERESTING) {
                        /*
@@ -470,7 +461,7 @@ static void sort_first_epoch(struct commit *head, struct commit_list **stack)
 
                        } else {
                                sort_first_epoch(parent, stack);
-                               if (reversed_parents) {
+                               if (parents) {
                                        /*
                                         * This indicates a possible
                                         * discontinuity it may not be be
@@ -621,20 +612,27 @@ int sort_list_in_merge_order(struct commit_list *list, emitter_func emitter)
                        base->object.flags |= BOUNDARY;
 
                while (reversed) {
-                       sort_first_epoch(pop_commit(&reversed), &stack);
-                       if (reversed) {
-                               /*
-                                * If we have more commits to push, then the
-                                * first push for the next parent may (or may
-                                * not) represent a discontinuity with respect
-                                * to the parent currently on the top of
-                                * the stack.
-                                *
-                                * Mark it for checking here, and check it
-                                * with the next push. See sort_first_epoch()
-                                * for more details.
-                                */
-                               stack->item->object.flags |= DISCONTINUITY;
+                       struct commit * next = pop_commit(&reversed);
+
+                       if (!(next->object.flags & VISITED)) {
+                               sort_first_epoch(next, &stack);
+                               if (reversed) {
+                                       /*
+                                        * If we have more commits 
+                                        * to push, then the first
+                                        * push for the next parent may 
+                                        * (or may * not) represent a 
+                                        * discontinuity with respect
+                                        * to the parent currently on 
+                                        * the top of the stack.
+                                        *
+                                        * Mark it for checking here, 
+                                        * and check it with the next 
+                                        * push. See sort_first_epoch()
+                                        * for more details.
+                                        */
+                                       stack->item->object.flags |= DISCONTINUITY;
+                               }
                        }
                }